data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a1f4/8a1f4206655414b813a63bcc695d8906549b9ff3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca02d/ca02dbd7ef966c20f0be42210c9a338bbc1c3238" alt=""
In his
Preface to Dorian Gray, Oscar Wilde writes, and I agree, that "It is the spectator and not life that art truly mimics." In other words, human experience must be filtered or translated through someone's conscious mind; and it is
this consciousness - and not merely life -that is truly being represented in any work of art.
Put another way, what we create betrays who we are.
Consider a most obvious example: creation. The beauty and order of the universe reveals, in part, the character of the One who created it. Scripture affirms this notion, saying, "For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made" (Romans 1.18-19). In the same way, we ourselves are God's living works of art - each individual, His
poema, or, workmanship, illuminating some aspect of His personality (Ephesians 2.10).
Just as God reveals His character in that which He has created, so we reveal ourselves in what we create. This principle is perhaps most evident in the world of painting where what you see on the canvas is not just a reflection of the outside world - it is a window into the world inside the artist - a picture or mirror of his soul.
In
The Cry one momentarily partakes of the anguish of Munch:
Dance reveals the colorful exuberance of Matisse:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/083ee/083ee1765e2e5dac52323830e451774888415bc5" alt=""
One need not be told that Mary Cassatt harbored a reverence for motherhood; one need only look at one of her paintings:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04441/044411ec92950df23b2888308bcf46bd03a11d06" alt=""
When I absorb myself in a novel, I am really plunging into the mind or soul of its author. I am achieving a kind of sustained, if temporary, psychic unity with him - borrowing his glasses, walking as he walks, seeing the world as he sees it.
Thus, in its barest essence, art is not only a reflection of the soul of the artist; it is a representation of his mode of perception,
his way of seeing, and it is this mode of perception which, more than anything else, he is sharing with his audience. Here we are presented with a paradox: for on the one hand, all art is "true;" and on the other, none of it is.
But what may be stated unequivocally is this: there is an ongoing if invisible transaction which takes place between the observer and the work of art whereby the artist's mode of perception is translated onto his art and then imparted to the observer. In this way all artists, whether they like it or not, are in some sense teachers.
I will never forget how my imagination lit up like a torch when I first read
Fern Hill, the poem in which Dylan Thomas describes his rambling walk through the English countryside: "All the moon long I heard," come the words, "blessed among stables, the nightjars / Flying with the ricks, and the horses / Flashing into the dark."
Gerard Manley Hopkins's poem,
Pied Beauty, with its infectious, seemingly spontaneous rhythms, had an almost identical effect: "GLORY be to God," he writes, "for dappled things— / For skies of couple-colour as a brinded cow; / For rose-moles all in stipple upon trout that swim; / Fresh-firecoal chestnut-falls; finches’ wings..."
I was compelled to ask myself whether this world of flashing horses and skies of couple-colour as a brinded cow was the same one in which I was living, for I palely recognized the silhouettes.
Were these ordinary glories things I had learned to overlook? Or, perhaps worse, had I yet to learn how to really see them?Either way I knew that something wondrous which in me had been lying either dead or dormant was awoken... and I became alive to the sacred beauty of the world in a new and more vigorous way.
Interestingly, both artists had one thing in common: they did not view the world as an accidental collision of atoms but a sacred universe, something God created, and into which He breathed His breath of life. Hence their mode of perception was primarily influenced by Christ - their imaginations, along with their hearts and minds, had been touched - baptized, even, into a new way of seeing.
Like Thomas and Hopkins, I believe that Christ created the world through the power of His Word; and that it is this same Word which - even now, at
this moment - holds atom upon atom together in the great fabric that forms the sea and the sky - and even the skin that envelops my body.
For this reason, to
resist allowing His Word to influence - yes, even dictate - my "reading" of human experience would be like trying to fly a kite while banishing the presence of the wind.
Instead, like Paul, I consider it my highest aspiration to "know nothing but Jesus Christ and Him crucified," - in hope that all I touch will be tainted with the fragrance of Christ. This does not mean that I cannot rest my narrative eye on that which is not Christ - for then I would have to shut my eyes to the world; nor does it mean that I should exclude the grotesque admission or representation of sin and suffering. Rather it requires that I see Christ - and by that I mean,
the possibility of redemption - in everything.
His flesh and blood sacrifice becomes the lens through which I perceive the world.
For example, my father told me of an encounter he had with Haitian refugee children in a town outside Port au Prince. The children were sitting in a dirt yard in front of a clapboard church, making kites by stretching scraps of plastic over sticks that had been tied together with string. When they saw my father they approached him smiling and, in spontaneous unison, burst into song:
"We are not forgotten! We are not forgotten!" they sang, in broken but discernable English. They took my father's hands and they laughed as they sang,
"We are not forgotten! He calls us by name!"Now from a purely common sense standpoint, there is a great sense of irony in this story for one could argue that, if anyone is forgotten, it is these children. But when viewed through the lenses of Christ, the situation begs a different reading for, in Christ, there is hope for these children because there
is a God who sees. And though they may be but nameless faces to most of the world, there is a God who calls them by name, and Who suffered unimaginable torments so they could come unto Him and be not only comforted, but saved.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7eb9/f7eb9157d189c5d906c4e571b744e3a998944a3a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d4f0/8d4f0d06bec07ff39c4e43ec0b54f1c8d3fa60bf" alt=""
In this way, the whole of the Christian life is a process of transformation, of learning or re-learning how to see. We not only see things in terms of what is; but what can be - indeed, what will be.
And it is this way of seeing which I hope will give flesh to the bones of my work - just as it gives breath to my life.